Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case law at both the federal and state levels.

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It's properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents with the boy or girl never approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they could Lower off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.

The ruling on the first court created case regulation that must be accompanied by other courts until or Unless of course either new legislation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is set up and also the employee is found guilty after thanks process of legislation, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the assorted penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct is not adequate nevertheless the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful fashion. Read more

Lots of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are available online through the Caselaw Access Project.

In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court from the United States. Decreased courts over the federal level include the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related to your United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that require parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its personal judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every single state is frequently referred to as the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Though state courts may additionally generally hear cases involving federal laws.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it really is convenient for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a here Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to dispose of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has arrived at this sort of stage. Read more

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is effectively-settled that whilst considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the benefit of all the qualified candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who are found to get most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked by the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of your respondent department.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law demands that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.

Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in the particular court. Indeed, Every circuit has its own list of binding case regulation. Due to this fact, a judgment rendered in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

States also usually have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, like family legislation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common law, would be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision via the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) just isn't strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in Big apple is not really binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more